Goodbye! Farewell!
Misc September 7th, 2008So Wednesday this week is the day the new LHC supercollider is switched on at CERN. And apparently, worse case scenario doesn’t just include the usual suspects - like funding for the project running out - but a black hole being created and swallowing the earth.
I do love it what the media latches onto scientific events such as these, because they consistently feel duty bound to simplify things to the point where they no longer make sense. I mean - liking the supercollider to “An enormous microscope”? Right, that’s a perfect analogy, if you imagine a microscope working by smashing thing with an enormous hammer and then classifying the resulting bits by how far they flew.
Scientists conducting the experiment are essentially looking for something that hasn’t yet been observed in the Standard Model (the current accepted wisdom of particles physicists) - the Higgs Boson. So because they don’t know exactly what it will be, anything could happen, right?
I do have some sympathy for critics to this event. The Standard Model is a terrible theory - not because of it’s accuracy or predictive power (which has been very good thus far), but because of it’s seemingly lunatic-assembled rules and definitions - which sit together like some sort of ugly tangled web. If beauty is indeed truth, then we could safely assume that the theory presented in particle physics today is complete tosh, which might be why they’re having trouble finding the last few bits in experimental results…
But my sympathy quickly evaporates when you actually look at the postulated dangers from the scientists against the LHC (who are at present frantically filing lawsuits to try and delay it’s switching on). First off is the theory that micro-black holes could form and slowly eat the earth over a period of 4 years. This completely ignores the widely held belief that exactly the same kind of collisions are produced on the earth naturally, and even if micro black holes were formed, they cannot be surviving otherwise we’d already know. Second is the theory that the 120 tons of superfluid Helium II (used as coolant in the LHC’s superconducting magnets) could explode in a bosenova which would essentially be like an enormous thermonuclear detonation, but presumably with latin beats. These events are described as “inexplicable phenomenon”, which is not exactly hard evidence that one will be formed here. I mean, is there anything we know the LHC won’t do?
Sadly, i feel the media frenzy surrounding the fear of the unknown will quickly evaoprate once the damn thing actually goes online. And that’s a pity, because modern-day scientific discoveries do seem to suffer from a media blackout. For example, can you remember who won the Nobel prize for physics last year? Or in the last 10? Here’s hoping future LHC discoveries have a public interest that last a bit longer than a decaying Higgs Boson…
*** Update ***
Hooray! we’re still here! Although now CERN tell us they haven’t actually started smashing protons yet - and that won’t happen for another 2 months while things are calibrated. Doh! Another two months of suspense…













September 8th, 2008 at 2:50 am
“The media frenzy will evaporate”
That’s ok with me Rob, as long as the planet doesn’t.
Remember, Al Gore won the Nobel Prize for telling everyone that we’re going to destroy the planet, maybe that’s what opponents of the LHC are hoping for.
How they plan to collect it if they turn out to be right I’m not very sure….
September 8th, 2008 at 8:50 am
but … but … but we will find black holes and through that time travel will be made possible! … john titor told us all!
September 16th, 2008 at 6:11 pm
If it does, or doesn’t acknowledge the standard model (it was only a proton beam, no collisions as of yet), you brought a smile upon my face with the “but presumably with latin beats”
October 2nd, 2008 at 7:05 am
“if you imagine a microscope working by smashing thing with an enormous hammer and then classifying the resulting bits by how far they flew”
it works almost like that, in microscopes they hit things with light, and our eyes, or electronic detectors, collect data from scattered photons. sometimes they use strong light, so that it actually strikes electons out of their orbits; and when they fall back, you see interesting features “highlighted”…
October 2nd, 2008 at 5:56 pm
true. But focusing on the *only* similarity does not a comparison make. Using your theory, i could say for example that a space shuttle works a lot like an albatross because it has wings…
October 4th, 2008 at 3:00 am
If only albatros could eat enough rotten fish to produce fart powerful enough to launch himself into orbit, then maybe yes…